TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515KA_A516KA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 18%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 10.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics2.46% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive40.4% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515KA_A516KA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X515KA
Memory0.6 GB free of 4 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210927
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 06 '22 at 01:03
Run Duration143 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron N4500
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.1 GHz, turbo 2.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
10.5% Very poor
Memory 8.35
1-Core 44.3
2-Core 72
21% 41.5 Pts
4-Core 73.2
8-Core 70.5
10% 71.8 Pts
64-Core 35.1
2% 35.1 Pts
Poor: 10% ↑
This bench: 10.5%
 Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Asus(1043 197C) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2114
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
2.46% Terrible
Lighting 2.7
Reflection 3.1
Parallax 3.1
2% 2.97 fps
MRender 4.3
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 3.7
3% 3.63 fps
Poor: 2% ↑
This bench: 2.46%
 Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GB
429GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 002C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 179 363 69 133 230 365 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
40.4% Average
Read 460
Write 241
Mixed 390
SusWrite 223
73% 328 MB/s
4K Read 11.5
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 6.8
28% 7.13 MB/s
Poor: 99% ↑
This bench: 40.4%
 Great: 290%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244BB0-CWE 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
14.7% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 6.3
MC Mixed 5.5
16% 5.6 GB/s
SC Read 1.4
SC Write 4.1
SC Mixed 2.9
8% 2.8 GB/s
Latency 419
10% 419 ns
Poor: 15% ↑
This bench: 14.7%
 Great: 41%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515KA_A516KA Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X515KA_A516KA

CPU
Celeron N4500IntelBench 28%, 1,026 samples5x
Pentium Silver N6000IntelBench 34%, 1,823 samples4x
GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples5x
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 4%, 1,242 samples4x
SSD
OM8PDP3256B-AB1 256GBKingstonBench 116%, 738 samples5x
SSDPEKNU512GZ 512GBIntelBench 185%, 19,397 samples2x
PC SN530 SDBPNPZ-256G-1002 256GBWDCBench 134%, 10,140 samples2x
RAM
M471A5244BB0-CWE 1x4GBSamsungBench 32%, 92 samples7x
JM3200HSB-16G 1x16GBTranscendBench 44%, 88 samples1x
Group Inc TEAMGROUP-SD4-3200 1x8GBTeamBench 42%, 25 samples1x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback