ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asrock H87 Performance

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing CPU, RAM
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Graphics	36% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Motherboard	Asrock H87 Performance (all builds)
Memory	4.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20150729
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Dec 12 '15 at 08:40
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	1%

PC Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E3-1240 v3-$203 3,014 User benchmarks, average bench 72% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		1-Core 110 2-Core 221 75% 166 Pts	4-Core 428 8-Core 568 63% 498 Pts	64-Core 569 35% 569 Pts
Poor: 56% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500 94,130 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Gigabyte(1458 254D) 3GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.300.1025.1001 Performing below potential (74^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	36% Below average	Lighting 46.5 Reflection 32 Parallax 66.8 38% 48.4 fps	MRender 30.4 Gravity 47.4 Splatting 40.3 32% 39.4 fps
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 62GB free Firmware: 2.25 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 99 99 2512893 (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 92 92 -102099962552800 (0C) Power cycle count 98 98 2748 (AB) Unknown 0 0 0 (AC) Unknown 0 0 0 (AE) Unknown 0 0 641 (B1) Unknown 0 0 3 (B5) Unknown 0 0 0 (B6) Unknown 0 0 0 (BB) vendor-specific 0 0 727 (C2) HDA temperature 30 30 128850984990 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 120 120 2512893 (C4) Reallocation count 100 100 0 (C9) Soft read error rate 120 120 2512893 (CC) Soft ECC correction 120 120 2512893 (E6) GMR head amplitude 100 100 100 (E7) Temperature 100 100 0 (E9) Unknown 0 0 9710 (EA) Unknown 0 0 11077 (F1) Unknown 0 0 11077 (F2) Unknown 0 0 11062	49.1% Average	Read 202 Write 110 Mixed 125 32% 146 MB/s	4K Read 16.8 4K Write 104 4K Mixed 15.6 100% 45.4 MB/s	DQ Read 115 DQ Write 115 DQ Mixed 31.1 46% 86.9 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 49.1% Great: 61%
Samsung 850 Evo 120GB-$80 69,224 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 44GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (05) Reallocated sector count 100 100 0 (09) Power-on hours count 99 99 1991 (0C) Power cycle count 99 99 630 (B1) Unknown 98 98 38 (B3) Unknown 100 100 0 (B5) Unknown 100 100 0 (B6) Unknown 100 100 0 (B7) Unknown 100 99 0 (BB) vendor-specific 100 100 0 (BE) vendor-specific 66 59 34 (C3) Hardware ECC recovered 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 100 100 0 (EB) Unknown 99 99 4 (F1) Unknown 99 99 10209117193
Poor: 64% Great: 115%
WD Green 1TB (2011)-$64 143,477 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 535GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s Performing as expected (59^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 129 129 4508 (04) Start/Stop count 100 100 285 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 200 200 0 (09) Power-on hours count 100 100 682 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 100 100 222 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 2 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 195 195 17038 (C2) HDA temperature 113 107 30 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 0 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	67.7% Good	Read 119 Write 116 Mixed 130 92% 122 MB/s	4K Read 0.95 4K Write 2.18 4K Mixed 0.22 105% 1.12 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 67.7% Great: 85%
WD Blue 640GB (2008)-$33 94,563 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 457GB free Firmware: 01.03B01 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s Performing above expectations (75^th percentile) (ID) Attribute Now Worst Value (01) Raw read error rate 200 200 0 (03) Spinup time 149 147 5533 (04) Start/Stop count 91 91 9874 (05) Reallocated sector count 200 200 0 (07) Seek error rate 100 253 0 (09) Power-on hours count 70 70 21908 (0A) Spinup retry count 100 100 0 (0B) Calibration retry count 100 100 0 (0C) Power cycle count 94 94 6845 (C0) Power-off retract count 200 200 195 (C1) Load/Unload cycle count 197 197 9874 (C2) HDA temperature 110 101 37 (C4) Reallocation count 200 200 0 (C5) Current pending sector count 200 200 0 (C6) Offline scan uncorrectable count 200 200 0 (C7) UDMA CRC error rate 200 200 1 (C8) Write error rate 200 200 0	56% Above average	Read 105 Write 90 Mixed 97.3 74% 97.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.49 4K Write 2.02 4K Mixed 0.4 102% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 56% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Typical H87 Performance Builds (Compare 479 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H87 Performance - $141

CPU
Core i5-4670Intel $51Bench 66%, 49,019 samples	65x
Core i7-4770Intel $65Bench 70%, 176,321 samples	63x
Core i5-4670KIntel $62Bench 68%, 128,482 samples	53x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	42x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	37x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	21x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	16x
MX500 1TBCrucial $88Bench 106%, 202,785 samples	15x

RAM
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	15x
Fury DDR3 1600 C10 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 27,462 samples	12x
8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 Kingston 99U5471-020.A00LF 8JTF51264AZ-1G6E1 12GBMicronBench 49%, 25 samples	11x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $420

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.

The Best.

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback