Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

Performance Results


Gaming 12% Tree trunk	Desktop 69% Battle cruiser	Workstation 10% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	10.8% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive	58.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	15GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

23 months ago, 23 months ago, 21 months ago, 21 months ago, 18 months ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7 (all builds)
Memory	9.6 GB free of 15 GB @ 0.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100824
Uptime	4.4 Days
Run Date	Nov 05 '22 at 20:50
Run Duration	157 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	45%

PC Performing as expected (42^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 X 980-$148 8,133 User benchmarks, average bench 76% Socket 1366, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.35 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	69.2% Good	Memory 91 1-Core 83.3 2-Core 166 68% 113 Pts	4-Core 257 8-Core 428 42% 343 Pts	64-Core 501 31% 501 Pts
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 69.2% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 5770 37,602 User benchmarks, average bench 10% Sapphire(174B 1482) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.301.1901.0 Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Lighting 14.5 Reflection 13.9 Parallax 13.3 12% 13.9 fps	MRender 11.1 Gravity 11.6 Splatting 9.6 9% 10.8 fps
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 11%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Pro 256GB-$190 73,119 User benchmarks, average bench 95% 99GB free (System drive) Firmware: DXM0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 182 208 211 209 202 215 MB/s Performing way below expectations (1^st percentile)	58.3% Above average	Read 320 Write 113 Mixed 186 SusWrite 205 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 23.5 4K Write 34.3 4K Mixed 21.3 81% 26.4 MB/s	DQ Read 224 DQ Write 147 DQ Mixed 99.1 97% 157 MB/s
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 116%
Crucial C300-CTFDDAC128MAG 128GB 2,094 User benchmarks, average bench 53% 4GB free Firmware: 0002 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 250 Write 134 Mixed 167 41% 184 MB/s	4K Read 23.9 4K Write 40.8 4K Mixed 12.7 74% 25.8 MB/s	DQ Read 190 DQ Write 125 DQ Mixed 80.9 81% 132 MB/s
Poor: 41% Great: 62%
Maxtor 6L160P0 164GB-$55 548 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 9GB free Firmware: AB4J SusWrite @10s intervals: 43 43 43 44 43 43 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	24.9% Poor	Read 42.4 Write 49.8 Mixed 29.6 SusWrite 43.4 30% 41.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 3.5 4K Mixed 0.4 130% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 24.9% Great: 36%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 15GB 1,040 User benchmarks, average bench 47% null MHz 4096, 1024, 4096, 1024, 4096, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	44.4% Average	MC Read 16.1 MC Write 15.3 MC Mixed 15 44% 15.5 GB/s	SC Read 10.9 SC Write 8.8 SC Mixed 11.9 30% 10.5 GB/s	Latency 65.8 61% 65.8 ns
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 44.4% Great: 90%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-X58A-UD7 Builds (Compare 416 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 35%

Jet ski

Desktop 73%

Battleship

Workstation 28%

Raft

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X58A-UD7

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	66x
Core i7-920Intel $90Bench 62%, 69,074 samples	59x
Core i7 X 980Intel $148Bench 76%, 8,133 samples	49x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	30x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	24x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	17x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	21x
SSDNow V300 120GBKingston $38Bench 54%, 339,020 samples	15x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	14x

RAM
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	78x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	66x
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 58% - Above average

Total price: $394

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16