PC P65_P67RGRERA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics31.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive136% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPC P65_P67RGRERA  (all builds)
MotherboardCLEVO P65_P67RGRERA
Memory18.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160105
Uptime4.2 Days
Run DateNov 05 '22 at 20:48
Run Duration148 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-6700HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
65.9% Good
Memory 74.9
1-Core 91.5
2-Core 159
64% 109 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 461
48% 384 Pts
64-Core 464
29% 464 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 65.9%
Great: 69%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970M
Clevo(1558 6780) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8205
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
31.7% Below average
Lighting 40.1
Reflection 42.4
Parallax 37.9
33% 40.1 fps
MRender 39
Gravity 38.7
Splatting 33.2
30% 37 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 31.7%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung SM951 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB-$69
353GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXW7300Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 899 963 917 1015 1106 1141 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
136% Outstanding
Read 914
Write 545
Mixed 589
SusWrite 1,007
171% 764 MB/s
4K Read 19.6
4K Write 28.8
4K Mixed 23.4
75% 23.9 MB/s
DQ Read 475
DQ Write 162
DQ Mixed 381
265% 340 MB/s
Poor: 136%
This bench: 136%
Great: 262%
Samsung 850 Evo 2TB-$265
1TB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 358 395 395 405 407 406 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
77% Very good
Read 36.7
Write 41.7
Mixed 368
SusWrite 394
48% 210 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 34.5
120% 39.9 MB/s
DQ Read 348
DQ Write 295
DQ Mixed 325
242% 323 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 77%
Great: 135%
WD Blue 2.5" 1TB (2013)-$34
32GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 74 72 73 73 73 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
43.3% Average
Read 77.7
Write 75
Mixed 48.4
SusWrite 72.9
50% 68.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
134% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 43.3%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C13 3x8GB
3 of 4 slots used
24GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
63.4% Good
MC Read 22.1
MC Write 24.2
MC Mixed 21.9
65% 22.7 GB/s
SC Read 14.1
SC Write 22.8
SC Mixed 19
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 90.6
44% 90.6 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.4%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P65_P67RGRERA Builds (Compare 38 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: PC P65_P67RGRERA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 25% - Poor Total price: $94
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback