ECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 214%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 111%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 208%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 108%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics202% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive365% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK PRIME B450M-A
Memory26.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220209
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '22 at 17:50
Run Duration109 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$176
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.6 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
108% Outstanding
Memory 91.8
1-Core 178
2-Core 340
109% 203 Pts
4-Core 670
8-Core 1,078
107% 874 Pts
64-Core 1,514
94% 1,514 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 108%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,135
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
202% Outstanding
Lighting 295
Reflection 398
Parallax 336
240% 343 fps
MRender 346
Gravity 246
Splatting 184
203% 259 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 202%
Great: 230%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
432GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1653 1623 1634 1636 1497 1340 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
365% Outstanding
Read 2,706
Write 2,539
Mixed 1,953
SusWrite 1,564
491% 2,190 MB/s
4K Read 71.8
4K Write 188
4K Mixed 98.7
335% 119 MB/s
DQ Read 1398
DQ Write 1,163
DQ Mixed 1,239
939% 1,267 MB/s
Poor: 188%
This bench: 365%
Great: 410%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GB-$103
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
92% Outstanding
MC Read 39.2
MC Write 22.6
MC Mixed 35.2
92% 32.3 GB/s
SC Read 31.3
SC Write 22.5
SC Mixed 37.6
87% 30.5 GB/s
Latency 64.4
62% 64.4 ns
Poor: 59%
This bench: 92%
Great: 114%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x Builds (Compare 9 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 146%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 103%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 145%
UFO

System: ECT One Computer AMD FX-8320, 8x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 92% - Outstanding Total price: $872
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback