Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 37% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 32.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.14% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	95.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron J4125 2,594 User benchmarks, average bench 35% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	32.9% Below average	Memory 46.7 1-Core 50.5 2-Core 97.9 38% 65 Pts	4-Core 108 8-Core 135 16% 121 Pts	64-Core 129 8% 129 Pts
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 32.9% Great: 43%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 600 35,976 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Intel(8086 2212) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	2.14% Terrible	Lighting 2.2 Reflection 2.6 Parallax 2.3 2% 2.37 fps	MRender 3.9 Gravity 2.2 Splatting 4 3% 3.37 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 2.14% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
NS256GSSD530 256GB 27 User benchmarks, average bench 184% 206GB free (System drive) Firmware: V0323A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 410 422 430 423 474 429 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	95.9% Outstanding	Read 641 Write 513 Mixed 519 SusWrite 432 118% 526 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 63 4K Mixed 21.1 115% 40 MB/s	DQ Read 302 DQ Write 157 DQ Mixed 279 194% 246 MB/s
Poor: 100% ↑ This bench: 95.9% Great: 242%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
ABCD 123456789012345678 4x2GB 5,869 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM LPDDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	25.1% Poor	MC Read 7.9 MC Write 9.9 MC Mixed 10.9 27% 9.57 GB/s	SC Read 2.5 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 4.3 11% 3.77 GB/s	Latency 173 23% 173 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 25.1% Great: 29%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 35%

Jet ski

Workstation 4%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron J4125IntelBench 35%, 2,594 samples	21x
Celeron J4115IntelBench 34%, 544 samples	6x

GPU
UHD Graphics 600IntelBench 1%, 35,976 samples	27x

SSD
RBUSNS8154P3256GJ 256GBKingstonBench 96%, 18,615 samples	5x
P900F128GBH 128GBForeseeBench 84%, 27 samples	5x
128GB 128GBKimtigoBench 61%, 193 samples	3x

RAM
123456789012345678 4x2GBABCDBench 24%, 5,869 samples	27x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16