Intel X79

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 59.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive153% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (59%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory14 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '22 at 10:01
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 59%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1607 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
59.8% Above average
Memory 77.3
1-Core 76.8
2-Core 156
61% 103 Pts
4-Core 247
8-Core 246
33% 247 Pts
64-Core 256
16% 256 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 59.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 550-Ti-$250
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
CLim: 900 MHz, MLim: 1026 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 353.30
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
8.6% Terrible
Lighting 9.7
Reflection 13.8
Parallax 8.9
8% 10.8 fps
MRender 15
Gravity 11.6
Splatting 10.6
10% 12.4 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.6%
Great: 9%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 256GB
210GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM90.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 831 952 1137 1116 260 246 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
153% Outstanding
Read 936
Write 1,128
Mixed 939
SusWrite 757
212% 940 MB/s
4K Read 34.7
4K Write 75.9
4K Mixed 45.7
151% 52.1 MB/s
DQ Read 622
DQ Write 397
DQ Mixed 512
381% 510 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 153%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
37.8% Below average
MC Read 14.1
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.3
38% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 11
SC Mixed 9.3
28% 9.8 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 37.8%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback