Monster P15xEMx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemMonster P15xEMx  (all builds)
MotherboardMONSTER P15xEMx
Memory5.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit renk,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130124
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 05 '22 at 08:04
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3610QM-$300
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
63.2% Good
Memory 77.7
1-Core 70.8
2-Core 128
56% 92.2 Pts
4-Core 264
8-Core 381
40% 322 Pts
64-Core 394
24% 394 Pts
Poor: 42%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4000 (Mobile 1.25 GHz)
Clevo(1558 5105) 2GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.4358
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
3.19% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 15
Parallax 2.7
3% 7.2 fps
MRender 4.7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.6
3% 3.87 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.19%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$105
861GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 420 441 436 454 472 475 MB/s
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
106% Outstanding
Read 493
Write 474
Mixed 439
SusWrite 450
105% 464 MB/s
4K Read 27.6
4K Write 71.4
4K Mixed 43.8
136% 47.6 MB/s
DQ Read 390
DQ Write 353
DQ Mixed 368
277% 370 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 106%
Great: 128%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905428-071.A00LF 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
46.7% Average
MC Read 17.2
MC Write 16.3
MC Mixed 15
46% 16.2 GB/s
SC Read 14.3
SC Write 13.9
SC Mixed 14.4
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 85
47% 85 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 46.7%
Great: 51%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P15xEMx Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: Monster P15xEMx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 54% - Above average Total price: $405
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback