| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 47.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20161111 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 04 '22 at 23:07 |
| Run Duration | 112 Seconds |
| Run User | GBR-User |
| Background CPU | 13% |
PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
67.8%
Good
|
73% 132 Pts
|
47% 346 Pts
|
22% 354 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
30% 39.8 fps
|
28% 34.5 fps
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown DDR4-2400 CL16 16GB 1x16GB
1 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
42%
Average
|
41% 14.5 GB/s
|
37% 12.8 GB/s
|
43% 92.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-HDV R3.0 Builds (Compare 852 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock H110M-HDV R3.0
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $95Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 200x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $41Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 108x |
| Pentium G4560Intel $31Bench 57%, 70,054 samples | 106x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 125x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 90x |
| GTX 1050Nvidia $101Bench 26%, 269,381 samples | 61x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 86% - Excellent | Total price: $182 |