Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics193% is a record breaking 3D score, it's almost off the scale. This GPU can handle all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG ZENITH EXTREME  (all builds)
Memory54.3 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190731
Uptime3 Days
Run DateNov 04 '22 at 21:04
Run Duration245 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225
SP3r2, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
82.1% Excellent
Memory 87.4
1-Core 109
2-Core 216
78% 138 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 678
67% 546 Pts
64-Core 1069
66% 1069 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 85%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Nvidia(10DE 147D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 4875 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
193% Outstanding
Lighting 280
Reflection 284
Parallax 310
228% 291 fps
MRender 324
Gravity 232
Splatting 174
192% 244 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 193%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 2TB
895GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,400
Write 2,210
Mixed 1,745
472% 2,118 MB/s
4K Read 54.7
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 74.9
245% 84.6 MB/s
DQ Read 878
DQ Write 692
DQ Mixed 744
568% 771 MB/s
Poor: 221% Great: 431%
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
636GB free
Firmware: M3CR
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 454
Write 448
Mixed 427
99% 443 MB/s
4K Read 34.3
4K Write 66.5
4K Mixed 42.6
142% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 350
DQ Mixed 305
245% 345 MB/s
Poor: 75% Great: 125%
Seagate Desktop 8TB
2TB free
Firmware: 040B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 87.2
Write 108
Mixed 81.5
69% 92.1 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 4.5
4K Mixed 0.6
233% 2.37 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 93%
Toshiba HDWF180 8TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: GX0B
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 189
Write 194
Mixed 82.1
114% 155 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 6.4
4K Mixed 0.8
278% 2.97 MB/s
Poor: 68% Great: 133%
Lacie Rugged THB USB3 1TB
795GB free
Firmware: 1153
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 96.4
Write 101
Mixed 50.5
61% 82.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 17% Great: 62%
SanDisk Cruzer Fit 8GB
7GB free, PID 5571
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 25.1
Write 14
Mixed 10.9
19% 16.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 1.8
134% 3.9 MB/s
Poor: 7% Great: 13%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 2933 C14 8x8GB
8 of 8 slots used
64GB DIMM DDR4 2933 MHz clocked @ 1467 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
97.9% Outstanding
MC Read 36.9
MC Write 33.7
MC Mixed 33.9
100% 34.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.2
SC Write 38.6
SC Mixed 31.4
91% 31.7 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 99%
This bench: 97.9%
Great: 182%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG ZENITH EXTREME Builds (Compare 431 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 100%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 121%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG ZENITH EXTREME - $29

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 73% - Very good Total price: $832
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback