Asus H81M-K

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 34%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics76.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H81M-K  (all builds)
Memory13.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150514
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '22 at 18:32
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU 38%
Watch Gameplay: 1660-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-4460-$194
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 76.3
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 162
62% 106 Pts
4-Core 207
8-Core 203
28% 205 Pts
64-Core 267
16% 267 Pts
Poor: 46%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti-$143
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 516.94
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
76.1% Very good
Lighting 97.3
Reflection 95.7
Parallax 86.6
79% 93.2 fps
MRender 96.9
Gravity 87.9
Splatting 75.9
70% 86.9 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 76.1%
Great: 81%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 540s Series 480GB
108GB free (System drive)
Firmware: LSF043C
SusWrite @10s intervals: 258 215 147 155 140 120 MB/s
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Read 460
Write 384
Mixed 338
SusWrite 172
76% 339 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 52.7
4K Mixed 33.4
108% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 312
DQ Mixed 242
198% 282 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 95%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 500GB-$25
292GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 110 111 112 110 111 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 121
Write 120
Mixed 64.4
SusWrite 110
76% 104 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 1
170% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-050.A00LF 99U5471-052.A00LF 16GB
1600, 1333 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
49.2% Average
MC Read 16.9
MC Write 19.1
MC Mixed 15.9
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.4
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 14.6
41% 14.2 GB/s
Latency 87.7
46% 87.7 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 49.2%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H81M-K Builds (Compare 6,174 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus H81M-K - $50

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 62% - Good Total price: $287
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback