LTD 310H5SE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics27.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive73% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemLTD 310H5SE  (all builds)
MotherboardMicro-Star H510M PRO-E (MS-7D23)
Memory11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220225
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 04 '22 at 14:10
Run Duration124 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-11400-$120
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
Memory 83.8
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
95% 176 Pts
4-Core 564
8-Core 885
89% 725 Pts
64-Core 1,039
64% 1,039 Pts
Poor: 89%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 101%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1630
Nvidia(10DE 169C) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
27.3% Poor
Lighting 35.1
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 29.3
29% 31.6 fps
MRender 30.7
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 29.9
25% 30.2 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.3%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 120GB-$35
36GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3K87RA
SusWrite @10s intervals: 192 73 55 38 50 59 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
73% Very good
Read 491
Write 346
Mixed 99.8
SusWrite 77.9
56% 254 MB/s
4K Read 30.8
4K Write 74.3
4K Mixed 34.9
131% 46.7 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 95.7
DQ Mixed 111
103% 164 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 73%
Great: 82%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
618GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 60 60 61 59 58 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 35.3
Write 36.5
Mixed 64
SusWrite 59.7
37% 48.9 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
149% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3200C16D4/8GX 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
MC Read 32.5
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 28.2
88% 30.6 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 30.8
SC Mixed 24.8
72% 25.1 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 111%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 310H5SE Builds (Compare 20 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: LTD 310H5SE

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $124
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback