Intel SHARKBAY

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 28%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (9th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 91 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics1.47% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive18.9% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardIntel SHARKBAY  (all builds)
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20140331
Uptime0.7 Days
Run DateNov 04 '22 at 12:09
Run Duration140 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron G1830-$35
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
28.6% Poor
Memory 46
1-Core 19.5
2-Core 47.2
25% 37.6 Pts
4-Core 66.5
8-Core 70.4
9% 68.4 Pts
64-Core 90.9
6% 90.9 Pts
Poor: 37%
This bench: 28.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Intel(8086 0402) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5171
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
1.47% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.2
Parallax 2.6
2% 1.87 fps
MRender 2.2
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.1
2% 1.77 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.47%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc Solid State Disk 512GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0628A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.3 198 6.5 5.1 156 57 MB/s
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
18.9% Very poor
Read 248
Write 197
Mixed 15.1
SusWrite 71.2
29% 133 MB/s
4K Read 9.1
4K Write 6.2
4K Mixed 0.2
17% 5.17 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 18.9%
Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9905469-124.A00LF 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
10.9% Very poor
MC Read 3.9
MC Write 3.7
MC Mixed 2.9
10% 3.5 GB/s
SC Read 3.5
SC Write 2.9
SC Mixed 1.8
8% 2.73 GB/s
Latency 176
23% 176 ns
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical SHARKBAY Builds (Compare 301 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Intel SHARKBAY

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 67% - Good Total price: $142
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback