HP ZBook Studio G4

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics15.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook Studio G4  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 826B
Memory20.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211124
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateNov 04 '22 at 04:28
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7820HQ
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 85.8
2-Core 161
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 255
8-Core 403
40% 329 Pts
64-Core 427
26% 427 Pts
Poor: 31%
This bench: 64.1%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro M1200
HP(103C 826B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1150 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
15.6% Very poor
Lighting 18.4
Reflection 17.4
Parallax 19.2
15% 18.3 fps
MRender 24
Gravity 24.1
Splatting 15.9
17% 21.3 fps
Poor: 12%
This bench: 15.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Wd_black SN750 2TB
634GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 112000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1521 1310 833 813 839 860 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,665
Write 1,747
Mixed 1,526
SusWrite 1,029
336% 1,492 MB/s
4K Read 33.7
4K Write 85.1
4K Mixed 47.9
158% 55.6 MB/s
DQ Read 705
DQ Write 453
DQ Mixed 610
447% 589 MB/s
Poor: 190%
This bench: 204%
Great: 347%
QNAP TR-004 DISK00 18TB
14.5TB free, PID 0013
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 172 185 197 181 200 204 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
62.7% Good
Read 130
Write 105
Mixed 55.9
SusWrite 190
163% 120 MB/s
4K Read 7.6
4K Write 0.2
4K Mixed 0.3
45% 2.7 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 84%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CRC - [0x9B85] CT16G4SFD824A.C16FDD 32GB
2400, 2400 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
75.8% Very good
MC Read 27.5
MC Write 30
MC Mixed 24.9
78% 27.5 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 28.8
SC Mixed 20.9
60% 21.1 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 69%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 82%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ZBook Studio G4 Builds (Compare 331 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook Studio G4

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback