Performance Results


Gaming 86% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 87% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	97.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Gigabyte X570 AORUS ELITE (all builds)
Memory	2.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit색
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20191108
Uptime	8.3 Days
Run Date	Nov 04 '22 at 01:29
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	KOR-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$205 635,419 User benchmarks, average bench 86% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (48^th percentile)	84.6% Excellent	Memory 86.4 1-Core 118 2-Core 225 81% 143 Pts	4-Core 445 8-Core 787 74% 616 Pts	64-Core 1,217 75% 1,217 Pts
Poor: 76% ↑ This bench: 84.6% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Zotac(19DA 2445) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 512.15 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	97.9% Outstanding	Lighting 124 Reflection 134 Parallax 122 101% 127 fps	MRender 94.2 Gravity 127 Splatting 114 92% 112 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 97.9% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 84GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,011 Write 1,696 Mixed 1,774 407% 1,827 MB/s	4K Read 60.2 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 74.4 247% 82.7 MB/s	DQ Read 938 DQ Write 434 DQ Mixed 680 506% 684 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94 695,664 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 281GB free Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 302 420 408 402 394 407 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	93.7% Outstanding	Read 453 Write 436 Mixed 346 SusWrite 389 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 32.6 4K Write 64.7 4K Mixed 41.6 137% 46.3 MB/s	DQ Read 219 DQ Write 185 DQ Mixed 201 151% 202 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 93.7% Great: 134%
RevuAhn_850X1M256GB 256GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 124GB free Firmware: R0815B SusWrite @10s intervals: 268 351 340 333 324 335 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	78.9% Very good	Read 436 Write 337 Mixed 283 SusWrite 325 77% 345 MB/s	4K Read 25.4 4K Write 59.4 4K Mixed 29.7 108% 38.2 MB/s	DQ Read 205 DQ Write 171 DQ Mixed 157 126% 178 MB/s
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 78.9% Great: 102%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A1K43CB2-CTD 2x8GB 29,586 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	88.1% Excellent	MC Read 32.9 MC Write 26.4 MC Mixed 34.8 90% 31.4 GB/s	SC Read 24.1 SC Write 26.3 SC Mixed 32.6 79% 27.7 GB/s	Latency 70.9 56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 88.1% Great: 96%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 159%

UFO

Desktop 94%

Nuclear submarine

Workstation 161%

UFO

GPU
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	915x
RTX 3070Nvidia $500Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	881x
RTX 2070S (Super)Nvidia $210Bench 115%, 663,603 samples	700x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	599x
980 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $107Bench 394%, 276,089 samples	431x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	398x

RAM
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	303x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	299x
F4 DDR4 3600 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 104%, 73,741 samples	276x

Value: 65% - Good

Total price: $1,485

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16