Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (5th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 95 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 15.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Graphics	1.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	29.9% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A4-6210 APU R3 Graphics 5,378 User benchmarks, average bench 30% Socket FT3b, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 1.65 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	15.9% Very poor	Memory 20.3 1-Core 22.1 2-Core 41.3 16% 27.9 Pts	4-Core 64.8 8-Core 77.3 9% 71.1 Pts	64-Core 83.7 5% 83.7 Pts
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 15.9% Great: 36%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon R3 Graphics 6,021 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Legend(17AA 5046) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.200.1060.0 Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	1.24% Terrible	Lighting 1.2 Reflection 2.8 Parallax 2 1% 2 fps	MRender 2.4 Gravity 1.3 Splatting 2.6 2% 2.1 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.24% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZ7LF120HCHP-000L1 120GB 3,932 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 86GB free (System drive) Firmware: FXT03L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 97 99 118 119 124 MB/s Performing way below expectations (0^th percentile)	29.9% Poor	Read 286 Write 109 Mixed 126 SusWrite 110 35% 158 MB/s	4K Read 10.7 4K Write 10.7 4K Mixed 9.6 34% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 18.3 DQ Write 33.5 DQ Mixed 18.4 16% 23.4 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 29.9% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GB 64,960 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	MC Read 6.2 MC Write 3.7 MC Mixed 5.5 15% 5.13 GB/s	SC Read 2.1 SC Write 2.4 SC Mixed 2.6 7% 2.37 GB/s	Latency 318 13% 318 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 29%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
A4-6210 APU R3 GraphicsAMDBench 30%, 5,378 samples	1x

GPU
Radeon R3 GraphicsAMDBench 2%, 6,021 samples	1x

SSD
MZ7LF120HCHP-000L1 120GBSamsungBench 48%, 3,932 samples	1x

RAM
HMT451S6BFR8A-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 25%, 64,960 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16