TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 25%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (48th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 52 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics20.2% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive253% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook Studio x360 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 844F
Memory38.3 GB free of 48 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220801
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '22 at 21:21
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User ARG-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (48th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2176M
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.7 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
79.5% Very good
Memory 81.5
1-Core 126
2-Core 221
81% 143 Pts
4-Core 418
8-Core 624
65% 521 Pts
64-Core 755
47% 755 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 79.5%
 Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P1000
HP(103C 8451) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1518 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 512.78
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
20.2% Poor
Lighting 24.4
Reflection 29.4
Parallax 21.4
20% 25.1 fps
MRender 28.3
Gravity 23.6
Splatting 24.4
21% 25.4 fps
Poor: 17% ↑
This bench: 20.2%
 Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$93
318GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1582 1467 1442 1442 1402 1183 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
253% Outstanding
Read 2,107
Write 1,802
Mixed 1,525
SusWrite 1,420
384% 1,713 MB/s
4K Read 44.3
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 54.8
176% 57.4 MB/s
DQ Read 594
DQ Write 618
DQ Mixed 594
450% 602 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑
This bench: 253%
 Great: 410%
Adata XPG SX8200 Pro NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$87
462GB free
Firmware: R0906I Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 957 938 924 919 923 927 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
192% Outstanding
Read 1,138
Write 813
Mixed 1092
SusWrite 931
223% 994 MB/s
4K Read 48.4
4K Write 84.4
4K Mixed 60.4
195% 64.4 MB/s
DQ Read 785
DQ Write 510
DQ Mixed 513
419% 603 MB/s
Poor: 175% ↑
This bench: 192%
 Great: 372%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M474A2K43BB1-CTD M471A4G43MB1-CTD 47GB
2667, 2667 MHz
16384, 32767 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
83.9% Excellent
MC Read 31
MC Write 33.1
MC Mixed 26.1
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 16.2
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 26.1
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 77.8
51% 77.8 ns
Poor: 41% ↑
This bench: 83.9%
 Great: 80%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical ZBook Studio x360 G5 Builds (Compare 433 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 23%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard

System: HP ZBook Studio x360 G5

CPU
Core i7-8750HIntelBench 70%, 442,631 samples114x
Xeon E-2176MIntelBench 77%, 4,000 samples77x
Core i7-9750HIntelBench 73%, 328,182 samples59x
GPU
Quadro P1000NvidiaBench 20%, 5,264 samples154x
UHD Graphics 630IntelBench 5%, 506,702 samples133x
Quadro P2000NvidiaBench 28%, 4,738 samples88x
SSD
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H1 512GBSamsungBench 209%, 20,750 samples60x
KIOXIA 512GBKxg60znv512gBench 192%, 6,082 samples25x
MZVLB512HAJQ-000H7 512GBSamsungBench 183%, 2,021 samples24x
RAM
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 82%, 20,439 samples71x
M471A2K43CB1-CTD 1x16GBSamsungBench 44%, 44,819 samples51x
M471A2K43DB1-CTD 2x16GBSamsungBench 81%, 4,980 samples35x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback