Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics53% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemAsus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK FX516PR
Memory22.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs,
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210820
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '22 at 17:17
Run Duration98 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-11370H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 71
1-Core 141
2-Core 251
84% 155 Pts
4-Core 438
8-Core 511
62% 474 Pts
64-Core 643
40% 643 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070 (Laptop)
Asus(1043 160C) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2225
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
53% Above average
Lighting 60
Reflection 47.1
Parallax 62.3
49% 56.5 fps
MRender 66.9
Gravity 75.9
Splatting 78.7
61% 73.8 fps
Poor: 94%
This bench: 53%
Great: 127%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme SAMSUNG MZVLQ512HBLU-00B00 512GB
42GB free (System drive)
Firmware: FXM7201Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,240
Write 1,106
Mixed 1,110
257% 1,152 MB/s
4K Read 38.7
4K Write 77.1
4K Mixed 48.6
162% 54.8 MB/s
DQ Read 385
DQ Write 275
DQ Mixed 563
358% 408 MB/s
Poor: 111% Great: 253%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2G44AM0-CWE Crucial CT16G4SFRA32A.C16FP 32GB
3200, 3200 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
87.6% Excellent
MC Read 33.5
MC Write 36.3
MC Mixed 27.3
92% 32.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.7
SC Write 37.8
SC Mixed 19.2
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 99
40% 99 ns
Poor: 79%
This bench: 87.6%
Great: 92%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR Builds (Compare 2,692 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 85%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: Asus ASUS TUF Dash F15 FX516PR_FX516PR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback