Asus P53SJ

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 50%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 49.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.01% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive62.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (32%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus P53SJ  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK P53SJ
Memory3.4 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20111208
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '22 at 14:50
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 32%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2450M-$225
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
49.4% Average
Memory 71.7
1-Core 70
2-Core 115
53% 85.4 Pts
4-Core 157
8-Core 168
22% 163 Pts
64-Core 166
10% 166 Pts
Poor: 25%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Asus(1043 1682) 2GB
Driver: nvumdshimx.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
2.01% Terrible
Lighting 2.2
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 1.6
2% 2.1 fps
MRender 2.9
Gravity 3.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 3 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.01%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS900 240GB-$20
172GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS900613
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 88 89 91 90 92 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
62.8% Good
Read 373
Write 312
Mixed 290
SusWrite 128
62% 276 MB/s
4K Read 24.7
4K Write 47.2
4K Mixed 24.9
94% 32.3 MB/s
DQ Read 272
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 192
160% 233 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 62.8%
Great: 91%
Jmicron Tech 500GB
430GB free
Firmware: 3202
SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 27 28 27 27 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
23.7% Poor
Read 54.5
Write 25.6
Mixed 24.8
SusWrite 27.4
24% 33.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.9
206% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 23.7%
Great: 65%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5273DH0-CH9 Hynix HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
41.6% Average
MC Read 14.5
MC Write 14.5
MC Mixed 14.1
41% 14.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 13.3
SC Mixed 13.3
37% 12.8 GB/s
Latency 97.4
41% 97.4 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 41.6%
Great: 47%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical P53SJ Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 49%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Asus P53SJ

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $225
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback