Asus H170-PRO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 94%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (68th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 32 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics106% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive60.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus H170-PRO  (all builds)
Memory13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180516
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateNov 03 '22 at 13:11
Run Duration174 Seconds
Run User CHE-User
Background CPU10%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (68th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$249
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Memory 91.3
1-Core 130
2-Core 224
85% 149 Pts
4-Core 440
8-Core 686
70% 563 Pts
64-Core 665
41% 665 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Asus(1043 8679) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (67th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
106% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 115
Parallax 132
106% 126 fps
MRender 180
Gravity 128
Splatting 107
109% 138 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 106%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata Premier Pro SP900 128GB-$40
13GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 6.0.3b
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 99 98 97 77 89 MB/s
Performing below potential (20th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
60.8% Good
Read 211
Write 102
Mixed 188
SusWrite 92.5
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 31.6
4K Write 87.6
4K Mixed 30.1
133% 49.8 MB/s
DQ Read 176
DQ Write 127
DQ Mixed 118
97% 140 MB/s
Poor: 57%
This bench: 60.8%
Great: 80%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$29
404GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 169 171 171 171 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 164
Write 160
Mixed 104
SusWrite 170
110% 150 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 1.2
248% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 109%
Samsung HD401LJ 400GB
373GB free
Firmware: ZZ100-15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 70 69 69 70 71 71 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
39.3% Below average
Read 66.2
Write 70.8
Mixed 50.5
SusWrite 70.1
48% 64.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
147% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 39.3%
Great: 42%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$27
466GB free
Firmware: 0001SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 74 74 75 74 73 74 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
41.7% Average
Read 71.3
Write 77.7
Mixed 39
SusWrite 74
48% 65.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
85% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 9%
This bench: 41.7%
Great: 43%
WD Elements 25A3 6TB
2TB free, PID 25a3
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 131 131 129 131 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
93.3% Outstanding
Read 188
Write 164
Mixed 109
SusWrite 131
193% 148 MB/s
4K Read 8.4
4K Write 11.6
4K Mixed 0.8
453% 6.93 MB/s
DQ Read 0.5
DQ Write 11.3
DQ Mixed 0.5
403% 4.1 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 93.3%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4-2400C15-4GNT Crucial BLS4G4D240FSA.8FBD F4-2400C15-4GNT Crucial BLS4G4D240FSA.8FBD 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
82.6% Excellent
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31.7
MC Mixed 25.4
83% 29 GB/s
SC Read 19.7
SC Write 34.5
SC Mixed 25.5
76% 26.6 GB/s
Latency 65.3
61% 65.3 ns
Poor: 83%
This bench: 82.6%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H170-PRO Builds (Compare 2,370 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 62%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 52%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus H170-PRO - $105

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 68% - Good Total price: $598
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback