Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 165%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 106%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics160% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive445% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory25.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220427
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateNov 03 '22 at 11:18
Run Duration205 Seconds
Run User MEX-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 5900X-$260
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 92.8
1-Core 154
2-Core 311
101% 186 Pts
4-Core 612
8-Core 1,128
104% 870 Pts
64-Core 2,183
135% 2,183 Pts
Poor: 87%
This bench: 103%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3090-$1,198
Dell(1028 3880) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 5394 MHz, Ram: 24GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
160% Outstanding
Lighting 217
Reflection 244
Parallax 237
177% 233 fps
MRender 337
Gravity 181
Splatting 138
169% 219 fps
Poor: 185%
This bench: 160%
Great: 230%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black SN770 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB
291GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 731030WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3268 3498 3426 1122 238 285 MB/s
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
445% Outstanding
Read 4225
Write 3,512
Mixed 2,683
SusWrite 1,973
692% 3,098 MB/s
4K Read 75
4K Write 179
4K Mixed 90.6
324% 115 MB/s
DQ Read 1,373
DQ Write 1,138
DQ Mixed 1,231
929% 1,247 MB/s
Poor: 195%
This bench: 445%
Great: 507%
WDC WD40EZAZ-00SF3B0 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 179 179 179 178 177 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
26.9% Poor
Read 179
Write 169
Mixed 98.3
SusWrite 178
35% 156 MB/s
4K Read 16.7
4K Write 9.4
4K Mixed 1.1
32% 9.07 MB/s
DQ Read 1.3
DQ Write 13.9
DQ Mixed 1.7
3% 5.63 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 26.9%
Great: 39%
Hitachi HDS721075KLA330 750GB-$38
289GB free
Firmware: GK8OA97A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 54 54 54 55 54 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 60.9
Write 73.4
Mixed 43.6
SusWrite 54
43% 58 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 1
176% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 25%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 47%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KF3600C18D4/16GX 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
129% Outstanding
MC Read 60.6
MC Write 45.1
MC Mixed 39.5
138% 48.4 GB/s
SC Read 30.7
SC Write 27.1
SC Mixed 38.5
92% 32.1 GB/s
Latency 62.6
64% 62.6 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 129%
Great: 123%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 26,051 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING X570-PLUS (WI-FI) - $185

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $1,005
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make lots of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't care about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback