Gigabyte GA-H410M S2 V2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics55.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive67% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H410M S2 V2  (all builds)
Memory11.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20211123
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 03 '22 at 06:55
Run Duration130 Seconds
Run User THA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10105F
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
83.2% Excellent
Memory 93.1
1-Core 121
2-Core 228
84% 147 Pts
4-Core 398
8-Core 558
60% 478 Pts
64-Core 562
35% 562 Pts
Poor: 74%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 88%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1060 6GB
Zotac(19DA 1438) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (58th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
55.5% Above average
Lighting 69.3
Reflection 61.7
Parallax 66.7
56% 65.9 fps
MRender 65.2
Gravity 67.6
Splatting 64.2
54% 65.7 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 55.5%
Great: 62%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Biostar S100-240GB 240GB
161GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R1029A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 252 120 119 123 120 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
67% Good
Read 423
Write 321
Mixed 290
SusWrite 171
67% 301 MB/s
4K Read 29.7
4K Write 72.1
4K Mixed 19.1
108% 40.3 MB/s
DQ Read 140
DQ Write 223
DQ Mixed 32.6
67% 132 MB/s
Poor: 46%
This bench: 67%
Great: 93%
Vaseky V800/256G 256GB
121GB free
Firmware: 2102XKR
SusWrite @10s intervals: 283 343 358 365 369 291 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
76% Very good
Read 441
Write 349
Mixed 336
SusWrite 335
82% 365 MB/s
4K Read 20.3
4K Write 72
4K Mixed 25.1
101% 39.1 MB/s
DQ Read 116
DQ Write 206
DQ Mixed 161
122% 161 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 76%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown GD2.1131WS.001 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
40.6% Average
MC Read 14.6
MC Write 12.9
MC Mixed 11.7
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.5
SC Write 14.3
SC Mixed 12.7
38% 13.2 GB/s
Latency 62
65% 62 ns
Poor: 36%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H410M S2 V2 Builds (Compare 677 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H410M S2 V2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 113% - Outstanding Total price: $98
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate a lot of reddit accounts. UserBenchmark exposes their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback