| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 47.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| System | Micro-Star MS-7C51 |
| Motherboard | MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.8 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.7 GHz |
| Display | 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20191108 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Nov 01 '22 at 10:08 |
| Run Duration | 129 Seconds |
| Run User | IDN-User |
| Background CPU | 23% |
PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
52.9%
Above average
|
63% 110 Pts
|
30% 226 Pts
|
12% 189 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1650
Asus(1043 879B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2205 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 516.59
Performing below potential (60th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
47.3%
Average
|
48% 56.5 fps
|
46% 56.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
28GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP74
SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 57 43 34 36 52 MB/s
|
17.6%
Very poor
|
25% 34 MB/s
|
102% 0.67 MB/s
| |
|
Maxtor STM380215AS 80GB
8GB free
Firmware: 3.AAD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 39 37 38 39 39 39 MB/s
|
||||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown GD2.1127WH.006 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz
|
43.3%
Average
|
44% 15.5 GB/s
|
33% 11.6 GB/s
|
37% 107 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51) Builds (Compare 3,871 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: MSI A320M-A PRO (MS-7C51)
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 5 2600AMD $145Bench 73%, 179,588 samples | 538x |
| Ryzen 3 3200GAMD $75Bench 63%, 104,122 samples | 479x |
| Ryzen 5 3600AMD $90Bench 83%, 1,072,639 samples | 389x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples | 314x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 228x |
| GTX 1660Nvidia $200Bench 68%, 230,793 samples | 224x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $300 |