Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 30%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics89.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive47.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock Z77 Pro4-M  (all builds)
Memory0.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120510
Uptime7 Days
Run DateNov 01 '22 at 03:07
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 17%
Watch Gameplay: 2060 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (46th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570K-$50
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (66th percentile)
69.6% Good
Memory 86.4
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 188
72% 123 Pts
4-Core 319
8-Core 245
40% 282 Pts
64-Core 315
20% 315 Pts
Poor: 54%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2060-$287
Gigabyte(1458 402B) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (43rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
89.1% Excellent
Lighting 112
Reflection 102
Parallax 119
91% 111 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 101
Splatting 90.3
85% 106 fps
Poor: 80%
This bench: 89.1%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SanDisk Extreme 120GB-$160
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R112
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 80 79 81 80 83 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47.6% Average
Read 212
Write 98.6
Mixed 124
SusWrite 82
29% 129 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 55.1
4K Mixed 27.1
91% 33.3 MB/s
DQ Read 156
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 109
87% 123 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 47.6%
Great: 81%
WD WD20EZAZ-00WGYX0 2TB
291GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 85 89 91 89 94 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 25% Great: 102%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1x4GB
1 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
28.1% Poor
MC Read 9
MC Write 9.1
MC Mixed 8.4
25% 8.83 GB/s
SC Read 8.2
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 8.2
24% 8.27 GB/s
Latency 70.9
56% 70.9 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 30%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Z77 Pro4-M Builds (Compare 333 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 56%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 43%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock Z77 Pro4-M

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 60% - Above average Total price: $428
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback