Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 93%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics94.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI  (all builds)
Memory21.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220720
Uptime2.4 Days
Run DateNov 01 '22 at 01:32
Run Duration163 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 5800X-$180
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
100% Outstanding
Memory 74.7
1-Core 177
2-Core 351
105% 201 Pts
4-Core 671
8-Core 1,158
111% 915 Pts
64-Core 1,543
96% 1,543 Pts
Poor: 86%
This bench: 100%
Great: 112%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3060-$266
Asus(1043 8821) ≥ 4GB; rtx 3060
CLim: 2115 MHz, MLim: 3750 MHz, Ram: 12GB, Driver: 526.47
Performing below potential (13th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
94.1% Outstanding
Lighting 131
Reflection 84.4
Parallax 108
107% 108 fps
MRender 129
Gravity 73.7
Splatting 64.2
70% 89 fps
Poor: 90%
This bench: 94.1%
Great: 106%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Gigabyte GP-ASM2 1TB
135GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EGFM
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Read 2,146
Write 2,528
Mixed 2,229
516% 2,301 MB/s
4K Read 55.2
4K Write 211
4K Mixed 83.5
302% 117 MB/s
DQ Read 1,311
DQ Write 1,054
DQ Mixed 1251
918% 1,205 MB/s
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
181GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 112 112 110 119 111 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
41.2% Average
Read 29.7
Write 88.2
Mixed 25.3
SusWrite 114
47% 64.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.1
51% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 41.2%
Great: 107%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$28
931GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 173 171 168 173 171 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 182
Write 151
Mixed 46
SusWrite 169
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.5
132% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 101%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CMG32GX4M2E3200C16 CMG16GX4M1E3200C16 32GB
2133, 2133 MHz
16384, 16384 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
63.2% Good
MC Read 27.1
MC Write 16
MC Mixed 23.8
64% 22.3 GB/s
SC Read 21.8
SC Write 15.4
SC Mixed 23.7
58% 20.3 GB/s
Latency 91
44% 91 ns
Poor: 63%
This bench: 63.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI Builds (Compare 6,672 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 182%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 181%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X570 AORUS ELITE WIFI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 65% - Good Total price: $1,152
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback