Lenovo 90DF00CGMW

Performance Results


Gaming 37% Jet ski	Desktop 68% Battle cruiser	Workstation 28% Raft


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	64.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	69.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (49%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

18 months ago, 18 months ago.

System	Lenovo 90DF00CGMW (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO SKYBAY
Memory	10.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit färger
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20151211
Uptime	3 Days
Run Date	Oct 31 '22 at 15:59
Run Duration	153 Seconds
Run User	SWE-User
Background CPU	49%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6400-$72 171,457 User benchmarks, average bench 61% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	55.2% Above average	Memory 72.6 1-Core 80.8 2-Core 165 61% 106 Pts	4-Core 220 8-Core 221 30% 221 Pts	64-Core 249 15% 249 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 55.2% Great: 71%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% MSI(1462 3470) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 516.94 Relative performance (0^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	64.6% Good	Lighting 92.4 Reflection 102 Parallax 102 75% 99 fps	MRender 90.4 Gravity 92.8 Splatting 0.2 44% 61.1 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Sandisk SD8SB8U256G1001 256GB 506 User benchmarks, average bench 81% 73GB free (System drive) Firmware: X4120001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 175 162 164 158 143 146 MB/s Performing way below expectations (19^th percentile)	69.1% Good	Read 415 Write 362 Mixed 188 SusWrite 158 62% 281 MB/s	4K Read 26.6 4K Write 66.9 4K Mixed 21.3 103% 38.3 MB/s	DQ Read 345 DQ Write 206 DQ Mixed 221 179% 257 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 69.1% Great: 97%
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53 237,241 User benchmarks, average bench 106% 22GB free Firmware: M3CR023 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 428 Write 368 Mixed 361 86% 385 MB/s	4K Read 28.7 4K Write 74.8 4K Mixed 43.1 138% 48.9 MB/s	DQ Read 387 DQ Write 343 DQ Mixed 290 238% 340 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
Intel 320 Series 80GB-$60 4,402 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 18GB free Firmware: 4PC10362 SusWrite @10s intervals: 75 87 90 93 93 92 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 215 Write 90.2 Mixed 110 SusWrite 88.3 28% 126 MB/s	4K Read 17.1 4K Write 31.5 4K Mixed 15.8 63% 21.5 MB/s	DQ Read 137 DQ Write 60.5 DQ Mixed 63.5 56% 87 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GB 3,286 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	37.8% Below average	MC Read 13.7 MC Write 12.8 MC Mixed 11.8 36% 12.8 GB/s	SC Read 11.4 SC Write 12.7 SC Mixed 12.8 35% 12.3 GB/s	Latency 95.4 42% 95.4 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 42%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 90DF00CGMW Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 49%

Yacht

Desktop 70%

Battleship

Workstation 38%

Jet ski

System: Lenovo 90DF00CGMW

CPU
Core i5-6400Intel $72Bench 61%, 171,457 samples	8x
Core i5-6600KIntel $130Bench 72%, 342,244 samples	2x

GPU
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	8x
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	1x
GTX 980Nvidia $500Bench 59%, 167,107 samples	1x

SSD
SD8SB8U256G1001 256GBSandiskBench 81%, 506 samples	3x
MX500 500GBCrucial $53Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	3x
MZ7TY256HDHP-000L1 256GBSamsungBench 90%, 2,045 samples	1x

RAM
M378A2K43BB1-CPB 1x16GBSamsungBench 39%, 3,286 samples	8x
HMA82GU6MFR8N-TF 1x16GBHynixBench 39%, 5,448 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 123% - Outstanding

Total price: $205

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $171	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i3-12100F $80	Nvidia RTX 4070 $500	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16