Acer TravelMate P214-52

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 60%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.16% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive204% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer TravelMate P214-52  (all builds)
MotherboardCML Timpani_CM
Memory20.7 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit farver
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20210914
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 31 '22 at 10:23
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i3-10110U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
57.7% Above average
Memory 81.9
1-Core 50.3
2-Core 152
56% 94.8 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 206
27% 200 Pts
64-Core 184
11% 184 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 63%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics
Acer(1025 1413) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 26.20.100.7926
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
4.16% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 3.8
Parallax 5.2
4% 4.5 fps
MRender 6.1
Gravity 5.2
Splatting 7.1
5% 6.13 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.16%
Great: 6%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kxg60znv512g KIOXIA 512GB
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AGHA4101
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1065 819 755 793 812 759 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
204% Outstanding
Read 1,829
Write 1,371
Mixed 1,342
SusWrite 834
300% 1,344 MB/s
4K Read 43.4
4K Write 109
4K Mixed 53
192% 68.5 MB/s
DQ Read 600
DQ Write 355
DQ Mixed 408
322% 454 MB/s
Poor: 121%
This bench: 204%
Great: 247%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A2K43CB1-CTD Hynix HMA81GS6DJR8N-XN 24GB
2667, 3200 MHz
16384, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
70.4% Very good
MC Read 23
MC Write 28.5
MC Mixed 23.1
71% 24.9 GB/s
SC Read 13
SC Write 30.5
SC Mixed 22.7
63% 22.1 GB/s
Latency 77.2
52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 70.4%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TravelMate P214-52 Builds (Compare 352 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Acer TravelMate P214-52

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback