Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (86th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 14 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 82%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive51.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-X79-UD5  (all builds)
Memory13.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120705
Uptime0 Days
Run DateNov 02 '17 at 00:08
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User TUR-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3820
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.3 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
82% Excellent
Memory 95.3
1-Core 113
2-Core 208
81% 139 Pts
4-Core 372
8-Core 567
58% 469 Pts
64-Core 579
36% 579 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 82%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 660-$170
Asus(1043 8422) 2GB
CLim: 1376 MHz, MLim: 1698 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 388.13
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
23% Poor
Lighting 25.8
Reflection 24.5
Parallax 27.3
21% 25.9 fps
MRender 38.4
Gravity 32.4
Splatting 28.7
27% 33.2 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 23%
Great: 21%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Mrsad4h1 20GZC25C70 120GB
50GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MRV1
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
51.5% Above average
Read 329
Write 150
Mixed 169
47% 216 MB/s
4K Read 23.5
4K Write 43.6
4K Mixed 13.3
76% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 129
DQ Mixed 41.2
62% 120 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 59%
Samsung HD502HJ 500GB-$50
151GB free
Firmware: 00E4
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Read 97.4
Write 103
Mixed 83.1
71% 94.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.57
4K Write 2.34
4K Mixed 0.5
123% 1.14 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 77%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 4x4GB
4 of 8 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 38.2
MC Write 41.5
MC Mixed 37.7
112% 39.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 56.1
71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 101%
Great: 96%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-X79-UD5 Builds (Compare 169 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 45%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-X79-UD5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $312
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback