Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 30% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (15th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 85 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 28.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	36.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

Very high background CPU (66%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 1007U 5,995 User benchmarks, average bench 39% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.5 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	28.5% Poor	Memory 52.4 1-Core 30.2 2-Core 30.1 28% 37.6 Pts	4-Core 29.4 8-Core 30.5 4% 30 Pts	64-Core 30.2 2% 30.2 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 28.5% Great: 47%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz) 28,701 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 138D) 2GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 10.18.10.5161 Performing below expectations (24^th percentile)	1.04% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 1.3 1% 0.97 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 1 Splatting 1.8 1% 1.6 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.04% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Fanxiang S101 256GB 810 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 221GB free (System drive) Firmware: HPS2227F SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 295 291 307 304 364 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 179 Write 161 Mixed 144 SusWrite 306 45% 198 MB/s	4K Read 8 4K Write 15.5 4K Mixed 4.4 26% 9.3 MB/s	DQ Read 102 DQ Write 30.5 DQ Mixed 16.5 25% 49.7 MB/s
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 98%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Hynix HMT451S6MFR6C-PB 1x4GB 99 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 1 of 4 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	17.1% Very poor	MC Read 6 MC Write 5.4 MC Mixed 5.7 16% 5.7 GB/s	SC Read 5.7 SC Write 4.9 SC Mixed 3.7 14% 4.77 GB/s	Latency 152 26% 152 ns
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 17.1% Great: 33%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 1007UIntelBench 39%, 5,995 samples	61x
Pentium 2117UIntelBench 43%, 5,157 samples	15x

GPU
HD Graphics (G3 Pentium/Celeron 1.0/1.1 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 28,701 samples	75x
GTX 650Nvidia $112Bench 8%, 69,673 samples	1x

RAM
EDJ4216EFBG-GNL-F 1x4GBElpidaBench 24%, 494 samples	42x
EDJ4216EFBG-GNL-F 1x2GBElpidaBench 22%, 279 samples	17x
HMT451S6MFR6C-PB 1x4GBHynixBench 28%, 99 samples	15x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16