Notebook W65_W670SH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (78th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 22 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (43%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemNotebook W65_W670SH  (all builds)
MotherboardNotebook W65_W670SH
Memory4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 2048 x 1536 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130815
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '22 at 17:41
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 43%

 PC Performing above expectations (78th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700MQ-$209
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 83.8
1-Core 90.1
2-Core 172
68% 115 Pts
4-Core 276
8-Core 435
44% 355 Pts
64-Core 434
27% 434 Pts
Poor: 32%
This bench: 67.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 4600 (Mobile 1.15 GHz)
Clevo(1558 6565) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4416
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
3.29% Terrible
Lighting 3.6
Reflection 5.8
Parallax 6.7
3% 5.37 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 2.3
Splatting 4.8
4% 4.93 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 3.29%
Great: 3%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM841 mSATA 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: DXT43D0Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 144 165 165 175 144 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
66.3% Good
Read 446
Write 131
Mixed 147
SusWrite 158
48% 221 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 22
97% 34.4 MB/s
DQ Read 342
DQ Write 87.8
DQ Mixed 58.2
84% 163 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 77%
Imation Nano Pro 8GB
3GB free, PID 063d
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.4 4.1 4 3.7 4 3.6 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
18.6% Very poor
Read 99.8
Write 10.2
Mixed 10
SusWrite 3.8
26% 31 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
52% 4.67 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 18.6%
Great: 9%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT51264BF160B.C16F 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
52.6% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 19.2
MC Mixed 15.4
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 13.8
SC Write 16.3
SC Mixed 17.7
46% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 73.8
54% 73.8 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 52.6%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical W65_W670SH Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Notebook W65_W670SH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $209
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback