XUM B75

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 65.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics3.83% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive47% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (20%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemXUM B75  (all builds)
MotherboardXUM B75
Memory11.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 30 '22 at 15:04
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 20%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3470-$59
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
65.5% Good
Memory 82.4
1-Core 87.8
2-Core 172
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 280
8-Core 296
38% 288 Pts
64-Core 293
18% 293 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 65.5%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 86CB) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
3.83% Terrible
Lighting 4.5
Reflection 6.2
Parallax 5
4% 5.23 fps
MRender 6.4
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 5
4% 5.1 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 3.83%
Great: 4%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
CT1000BX500SSD1 1TB
845GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR030
SusWrite @10s intervals: 210 195 44 44 75 74 MB/s
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
47% Average
Read 232
Write 212
Mixed 210
SusWrite 107
43% 190 MB/s
4K Read 20.5
4K Write 45.6
4K Mixed 17.4
78% 27.8 MB/s
DQ Read 162
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 35.3
66% 130 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 47%
Great: 100%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M378B1G73QH0-YK0 Kingston 99U5403-159.A01LF 16GB
0, 0 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
54.5% Above average
MC Read 19.9
MC Write 20.3
MC Mixed 17.3
55% 19.2 GB/s
SC Read 15.3
SC Write 15.2
SC Mixed 16.2
44% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 76.2
52% 76.2 ns
Poor: 41%
This bench: 54.5%
Great: 58%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical B75 Builds (Compare 366 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

System: XUM B75

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $356
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback