Lenovo 81LK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics27% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive86.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81LK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220524
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 30 '22 at 10:49
Run Duration111 Seconds
Run User SVK-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9300H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 83.4
1-Core 118
2-Core 204
78% 135 Pts
4-Core 348
8-Core 413
49% 381 Pts
64-Core 502
31% 502 Pts
Poor: 38%
This bench: 72.7%
Great: 81%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 1050
Legend(17AA 3A2D) 3GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 31.0.15.2647
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
27% Poor
Lighting 34.6
Reflection 38.2
Parallax 37.7
28% 36.8 fps
MRender 28.1
Gravity 37.8
Splatting 25.7
25% 30.5 fps
Poor: 19%
This bench: 27%
Great: 28%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
RPFTJ256PDD2MWX 256GB
87GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 11.9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 449 216 221 222 383 209 MB/s
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
86.9% Excellent
Read 468
Write 598
Mixed 451
SusWrite 283
101% 450 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 49.9
4K Mixed 28.8
101% 34.5 MB/s
DQ Read 437
DQ Write 452
DQ Mixed 404
315% 431 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86.9%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3260ME78HAF-2666 1x8GB
1 of 1 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
35.8% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 11.8
MC Mixed 9.8
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.6
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 11
33% 11.4 GB/s
Latency 74.6
54% 74.6 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 46%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81LK Builds (Compare 6,347 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 24%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 81LK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback