Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 47% Yacht	Workstation 5% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	76.4% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Windows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.

High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

19 months ago, 19 months ago.

PC Performing as expected (45^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N5095 1,699 User benchmarks, average bench 43% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)	46.4% Average	Memory 57.4 1-Core 72.6 2-Core 143 52% 91 Pts	4-Core 206 8-Core 207 28% 207 Pts	64-Core 220 14% 220 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 57%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 4,536 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Device(1E50 800F) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9864 Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)	1.89% Terrible	Lighting 2.3 Reflection 3.2 Parallax 2.8 2% 2.77 fps	MRender 4.1 Gravity 2.6 Splatting 1 2% 2.57 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 1.89% Great: 3%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
minisforum 256GB 128 User benchmarks, average bench 79% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFM61.3 SusWrite @10s intervals: 310 168 187 175 179 185 MB/s Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	76.4% Very good	Read 410 Write 295 Mixed 307 SusWrite 201 68% 303 MB/s	4K Read 29.2 4K Write 60.2 4K Mixed 32 117% 40.5 MB/s	DQ Read 252 DQ Write 276 DQ Mixed 189 163% 239 MB/s
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 76.4% Great: 89%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Adata 1x8GB 25,310 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM DDR4 3200 MHz clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	38.3% Below average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 14.5 MC Mixed 12.7 40% 13.9 GB/s	SC Read 7.5 SC Write 11 SC Mixed 11.2 28% 9.9 GB/s	Latency 136 30% 136 ns
Poor: 21% ↑ This bench: 38.3% Great: 52%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 5%

Tree trunk

Desktop 43%

Speed boat

Workstation 5%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N5095IntelBench 43%, 1,699 samples	28x

GPU
UHD GraphicsIntelBench 2%, 4,536 samples	28x

SSD
OM8P0S3256B-A0 256GBKingstonBench 69%, 154 samples	13x
SATAIII 512GBIntensoBench 69%, 1,466 samples	2x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	2x

RAM
CBD32D4S2S1ME-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 50 samples	6x
CBD32D4S2S8MR-8 1x8GBKingstonBench 31%, 13 samples	4x
CT8G4SFRA32A.M8FRS Kingston CBD32D4S2S1ME-8 16GBCrucialBench 54%, 2 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16