Performance Results


Gaming 3% Tree trunk	Desktop 24% Surfboard	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (7th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 93 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 24.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	0.95% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	21.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory	6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing way below expectations (7^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-2410M-$160 46,742 User benchmarks, average bench 48% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 0.8 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	24.4% Poor	Memory 44.9 1-Core 11.4 2-Core 18.7 20% 25 Pts	4-Core 23.9 8-Core 38.8 4% 31.3 Pts	64-Core 38.9 2% 38.9 Pts
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 24.4% Great: 58%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz) 209,058 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Asus(1043 1652) 2GB Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459 Performing way below expectations (20^th percentile)	0.95% Terrible	Lighting 1.1 Reflection 0.5 Parallax 1.3 1% 0.97 fps	MRender 1.5 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.4 1% 1.27 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 0.95% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$28 166,392 User benchmarks, average bench 61% 85GB free (System drive) Firmware: SBFKB1E1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 94 72 93 89 99 100 MB/s Performing below potential (2^nd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	21.5% Poor	Read 181 Write 71.7 Mixed 127 SusWrite 91.1 26% 118 MB/s	4K Read 6.6 4K Write 11.6 4K Mixed 3.6 21% 7.27 MB/s	DQ Read 69.3 DQ Write 51.7 DQ Mixed 61.8 46% 60.9 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 21.5% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HB3SU004GFM8MMB33 0194 SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 6GB 45 User benchmarks, average bench 37% 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 2048 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	15.2% Very poor	MC Read 5 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 6.2 16% 5.5 GB/s	SC Read 2.9 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 1.8 7% 2.47 GB/s	Latency 181 22% 181 ns
Poor: 19% ↑ This bench: 15.2% Great: 48%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 4%

Tree trunk

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 3%

Tree trunk

GPU
HD 3000 (Mobile V1 1.1/1.2 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 209,058 samples	76x
HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 110,588 samples	14x
HD Graphics (G2 Pentium/Celeron 1.1/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 45,735 samples	9x

RAM
0194 SH564568FH8NZPHSCR 6GBHB3SU004GFM8MMB33Bench 37%, 45 samples	6x
HMT325S6BFR8C-H9 1x2GBHynixBench 19%, 1,846 samples	4x
M471B5273DH0-CH9 1x4GBSamsungBench 25%, 18,713 samples	4x

Value: 51% - Above average

Total price: $188

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16