Intel X79

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (3rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 97 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 16%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive41.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (93%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel X79  (all builds)
Memory13.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220614
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 28 '22 at 20:54
Run Duration135 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 93%

 PC Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-1607 0
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
16% Very poor
Memory 21
1-Core 15.2
2-Core 26.9
14% 21 Pts
4-Core 62.1
8-Core 70.2
9% 66.1 Pts
64-Core 68.1
4% 68.1 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 16%
Great: 68%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Spcc M.2 PCIe SSD 256GB
208GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EDFM90.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 274 301 290 296 242 223 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
41.5% Average
Read 250
Write 339
Mixed 269
SusWrite 271
64% 282 MB/s
4K Read 7.7
4K Write 12.8
4K Mixed 9.6
31% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 157
DQ Write 84.4
DQ Mixed 119
89% 120 MB/s
Poor: 93%
This bench: 41.5%
Great: 230%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT41GR7AFR4A 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1066 MHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
16% Very poor
MC Read 5.6
MC Write 6.8
MC Mixed 6
18% 6.13 GB/s
SC Read 2.9
SC Write 2.6
SC Mixed 2.3
7% 2.6 GB/s
Latency 313
13% 313 ns
Poor: 35%
This bench: 16%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X79 Builds (Compare 1,992 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 35%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Intel X79

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $158
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes the youtubers that are paid to promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback