QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics45.7% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory15.8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 15.8GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
SystemQEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)  (all builds)
Motherboard
Memory12.7 GB free of 15.8125 GB @ 0 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20150206
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '22 at 18:41
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User NLD-User
Background CPU 36%

 PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E3-1230 v3
CPU 0, 4 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
58.5% Above average
Memory 69
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 164
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 273
8-Core 311
38% 292 Pts
64-Core 312
19% 312 Pts
Poor: 52%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 290-$399
CLim: 1120 MHz, MLim: 1380 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 22.6.1
Performing below potential (51st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
45.7% Average
Lighting 57.7
Reflection 78.3
Parallax 71.5
47% 69.2 fps
MRender 60.9
Gravity 50.8
Splatting 48.2
43% 53.3 fps
Poor: 41%
This bench: 45.7%
Great: 50%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Qemu HARDDISK 43GB
11GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2.5+
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,578
Write 1192
Mixed 1,527
319% 1,432 MB/s
4K Read 31.2
4K Write 21.7
4K Mixed 27.6
94% 26.8 MB/s
DQ Read 76.8
DQ Write 79.1
DQ Mixed 83.2
61% 79.7 MB/s
Poor: 23% Great: 55%
Qemu HARDDISK 129GB
119GB free
Firmware: 2.5+
SusWrite @10s intervals: 228 231 227 279 254 183 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 22% Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
QEMU 1x15GB
1 of 1 slots used
15GB DIMM RAM
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
55.7% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 22.2
MC Mixed 17.8
57% 20.1 GB/s
SC Read 13.5
SC Write 17.6
SC Mixed 17
46% 16 GB/s
Latency 104
38% 104 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 151%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009) Builds (Compare 611 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 83%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 74%
Battleship

System: QEMU Standard PC (Q35 + ICH9, 2009)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $499
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback