Microsoft Surface Pro 7

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics11.1% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (19%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicrosoft Surface Pro 7  (all builds)
MotherboardMicrosoft Surface Pro 7
Memory8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.7 GHz
Display2736 x 1824 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220708
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 28 '22 at 04:59
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User AUT-User
Background CPU 19%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-1065G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
64.9% Good
Memory 60.9
1-Core 106
2-Core 197
67% 121 Pts
4-Core 371
8-Core 579
58% 475 Pts
64-Core 545
34% 545 Pts
Poor: 30%
This bench: 64.9%
Great: 70%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Microsoft(1414 0037) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.9621
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
11.1% Very poor
Lighting 13.4
Reflection 13.4
Parallax 14.6
11% 13.8 fps
MRender 13
Gravity 14.2
Splatting 14.5
12% 13.9 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 11.1%
Great: 13%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kbg40zpz256g TOSHIBA MEMORY 256GB
114GB free (System drive)
Firmware: AEMS0102
SusWrite @10s intervals: 500 456 679 339 404 392 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 58% Great: 93%
Adplus SuperVer 750GB
463GB free
Firmware: 6302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 84 80 83 81 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
24.9% Poor
Read 5
Write 82.5
Mixed 0.5
SusWrite 81.6
30% 42.4 MB/s
4K Read 0
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0
18% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 24.9%
Great: 54%
SDXC Card 498GB
305GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 11 11 13 11 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 13% Great: 30%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix H9HCNNNCPNALHR-NEE 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB Row of chips LPDDR4 clocked @ 3733 MHz
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
105% Outstanding
MC Read 41.8
MC Write 43.3
MC Mixed 36.5
116% 40.5 GB/s
SC Read 15.2
SC Write 33.6
SC Mixed 23.9
69% 24.2 GB/s
Latency 125
32% 125 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 105%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Surface Pro 7 Builds (Compare 1,951 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: Microsoft Surface Pro 7

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback