Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (45th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 55 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.67% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive129% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemAsus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK X712JA
Memory34.1 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20220704
Uptime2.1 Days
Run DateOct 28 '22 at 02:52
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (45th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G1
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.2 GHz, turbo 2.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
52.8% Above average
Memory 57.8
1-Core 107
2-Core 184
64% 116 Pts
4-Core 265
8-Core 335
38% 300 Pts
64-Core 357
22% 357 Pts
Poor: 28%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD G1
Asus(1043 1502) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9805
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.67% Terrible
Lighting 4.8
Reflection 6.4
Parallax 5.9
4% 5.7 fps
MRender 7.9
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 8.1
6% 7.43 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.67%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Nvme KINGSTON OM8PCP3 512GB
382GB free (System drive)
Firmware: ECFK52.3 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 867 860 59 52 77 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
129% Outstanding
Read 944
Write 927
Mixed 810
SusWrite 332
169% 754 MB/s
4K Read 35.1
4K Write 115
4K Mixed 51.6
180% 67.4 MB/s
DQ Read 297
DQ Write 384
DQ Mixed 393
282% 358 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 129%
Great: 195%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-VK Samsung M471A4G43AB1-CWE 39GB
2667, 3200 MHz
8192, 32767 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
50.1% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 18.6
MC Mixed 17.3
52% 18.2 GB/s
SC Read 11.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 14.5
41% 14.3 GB/s
Latency 134
30% 134 ns
Poor: 42%
This bench: 50.1%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA Builds (Compare 87 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Asus VivoBook_ASUSLaptop X712JA_S712JA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback