Gigabyte GA-AERO 17-XA

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 69%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 85.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics85.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive308% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AERO 17-XA  (all builds)
Memory27.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191217
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '22 at 16:11
Run Duration194 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing as expected (60th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-9750H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
85.1% Excellent
Memory 88.3
1-Core 120
2-Core 240
84% 150 Pts
4-Core 441
8-Core 685
70% 563 Pts
64-Core 820
51% 820 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 85.1%
Great: 87%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070 (Mobile Max-Q)
Gigabyte(1458 86A5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 511.65
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
85.6% Excellent
Lighting 102
Reflection 106
Parallax 108
83% 105 fps
MRender 150
Gravity 101
Splatting 93.2
91% 115 fps
Poor: 52%
This bench: 85.6%
Great: 94%
Intel UHD Graphics 630
Gigabyte(1458 86A5) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8190
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
6.28% Terrible
Lighting 6.3
Reflection 10
Parallax 8.7
5% 8.33 fps
MRender 11.5
Gravity 7.4
Splatting 11.8
8% 10.2 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 6.28%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
779GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2127 2179 2134 2158 2221 1748 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
308% Outstanding
Read 1,002
Write 2,258
Mixed 1,406
SusWrite 2,094
386% 1,690 MB/s
4K Read 66.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 82.1
268% 88.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1,483
DQ Write 1064
DQ Mixed 1207
920% 1,251 MB/s
Poor: 254%
This bench: 308%
Great: 469%
Samsung 980 PRO with Heatsink 1TB
603GB free
Firmware: 5B2Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2250 2262 2249 2240 2194 1612 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
324% Outstanding
Read 1,105
Write 1,951
Mixed 1,346
SusWrite 2,134
372% 1,634 MB/s
4K Read 69.5
4K Write 129
4K Mixed 89.5
288% 95.9 MB/s
DQ Read 1,557
DQ Write 1140
DQ Mixed 1274
972% 1,324 MB/s
Poor: 254%
This bench: 324%
Great: 469%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston MSI24D4S7D8MB-16 2x16GB
2 of 4 slots used
32GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
80.1% Excellent
MC Read 29.2
MC Write 30.9
MC Mixed 24.3
80% 28.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.4
SC Write 33.8
SC Mixed 25.5
74% 25.9 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 80.1%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-AERO 17-XA Builds (Compare 54 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 63%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AERO 17-XA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback