Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 83%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive78.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming
MotherboardGigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170906
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '22 at 15:47
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-8400-$114
U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
83% Excellent
Memory 81.9
1-Core 112
2-Core 228
78% 141 Pts
4-Core 461
8-Core 607
68% 534 Pts
64-Core 643
40% 643 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 83%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3070-Ti-$449
CLim: 2130 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 522.25
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (143 fps cap detected)
112% Outstanding
Lighting 143
Reflection 143
Parallax 143
116% 143 fps
MRender 143
Gravity 143
Splatting 128
112% 138 fps
Poor: 139%
This bench: 112%
Great: 170%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 QVO 1TB-$109
590GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVQ02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 79 79 80 79 79 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
78.1% Very good
Read 448
Write 421
Mixed 386
SusWrite 84.7
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 27.3
4K Write 67
4K Mixed 37.7
125% 44 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 342
DQ Mixed 356
268% 358 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 78.1%
Great: 121%
Team TM8FP6001T 1TB
617GB free
Firmware: VC0S036B
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1451 1474 1484 1591 1601 1599 MB/s
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
249% Outstanding
Read 1,785
Write 1,408
Mixed 1,205
SusWrite 1,533
333% 1,483 MB/s
4K Read 34.5
4K Write 79.6
4K Mixed 46.8
154% 53.6 MB/s
DQ Read 804
DQ Write 811
DQ Mixed 868
635% 827 MB/s
Poor: 131%
This bench: 249%
Great: 280%
USB3.0 FLASH DRIVE 124GB
28GB free, PID 6387
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 114
Write 73.6
Mixed 66.9
100% 85 MB/s
4K Read 4.6
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 1.3
95% 2.3 MB/s
Poor: 8% Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Ripjaws 4 DDR4 2800 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
70.3% Very good
MC Read 27
MC Write 27.3
MC Mixed 21
72% 25.1 GB/s
SC Read 15.5
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 19.2
59% 20.7 GB/s
Latency 77
52% 77 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 70.3%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming-CF Builds (Compare 3,060 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 93%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 93%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 85%
Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte Z370 AORUS Ultra Gaming - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $646
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $291WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback