LG 17Z90N-V.AA55A1

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (8th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 92 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics6.44% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive126% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory40GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 40GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Very high background CPU (62%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemLG 17Z90N-V.AA55A1  (all builds)
MotherboardLG 17Z90N
Memory29.8 GB free of 40 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display2560 x 1600 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20200604
Uptime1 Days
Run DateOct 27 '22 at 13:09
Run Duration116 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 62%

 PC Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-1035G7
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 1.5 GHz, turbo 1.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
38.5% Below average
Memory 52.2
1-Core 44.4
2-Core 85.1
37% 60.6 Pts
4-Core 136
8-Core 219
22% 177 Pts
64-Core 274
17% 274 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 38.5%
Great: 72%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Iris Plus G7
Device(1854 0361) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 30.0.100.9836
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
6.44% Terrible
Lighting 7.2
Reflection 7
Parallax 9.9
6% 8.03 fps
MRender 8.4
Gravity 9
Splatting 9.9
8% 9.1 fps
Poor: 6%
This bench: 6.44%
Great: 13%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
293GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXA7301Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 685 558 572 557 569 584 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
126% Outstanding
Read 1,206
Write 1,130
Mixed 912
SusWrite 588
215% 959 MB/s
4K Read 25.1
4K Write 46.5
4K Mixed 30.4
102% 34 MB/s
DQ Read 293
DQ Write 160
DQ Mixed 225
168% 226 MB/s
Poor: 130%
This bench: 126%
Great: 296%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A4G43MB1-CTD Hynix HMAA1GS6CMR6N-XN 39GB
2667, 3200 MHz
32767, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
41.1% Average
MC Read 16.7
MC Write 15.8
MC Mixed 14.1
44% 15.5 GB/s
SC Read 6.4
SC Write 9.8
SC Mixed 10
25% 8.73 GB/s
Latency 153
26% 153 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 17Z90N-V.AA55A1 Builds (Compare 3 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk

System: LG 17Z90N-V.AA55A1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback