HP Laptop 14-cm0xxx

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 29.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.91% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive28.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemHP Laptop 14-cm0xxx  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 84A0
Memory0.3 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180828
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateOct 27 '22 at 11:43
Run Duration177 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (31st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
29.1% Poor
Memory 47
1-Core 47.1
2-Core 67.2
34% 53.8 Pts
4-Core 65.3
8-Core 71.6
9% 68.4 Pts
64-Core 67
4% 67 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
HP(103C 84A0) 80MB
Ram: 80MB, Driver: 20.10.44
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
2.91% Terrible
Lighting 3.2
Reflection 4.5
Parallax 5.6
3% 4.43 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 4.3
Splatting 5.4
4% 4.1 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.91%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
V-gen09sm20ar128sdkm2 128GB 128GB
16GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S0413A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 36 39 45 51 39 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
28.2% Poor
Read 337
Write 263
Mixed 28.8
SusWrite 56.1
38% 171 MB/s
4K Read 11.9
4K Write 13
4K Mixed 1.6
27% 8.83 MB/s
DQ Read 130
DQ Write 47.2
DQ Mixed 1.7
24% 59.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 28.2%
Great: 84%
WD WD10SPZX-00HKTT0 1TB
341GB free
Firmware: 04.01A04
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 157
Write 87.6
Mixed 49.9
72% 98.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 4.4
4K Mixed 0.3
140% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 79%
USB SanDisk 3.2Gen1 123GB
111GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 27.5
Write 7.7
Mixed 17.9
20% 17.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.7
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.4
50% 1 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 44%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E1 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR4 2400 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 4.9
MC Write 4.7
MC Mixed 2.8
12% 4.13 GB/s
SC Read 1.3
SC Write 4.6
SC Mixed 1
7% 2.3 GB/s
Latency 172
23% 172 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 40%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Laptop 14-cm0xxx Builds (Compare 320 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 48%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: HP Laptop 14-cm0xxx

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback