HP ProBook 450 G5

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (49th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 51 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 54.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics5.33% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
SystemHP ProBook 450 G5  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 837D
Memory6.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors, 1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20201229
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 27 '22 at 11:04
Run Duration191 Seconds
Run User MUS-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing as expected (49th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 2.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Memory 68.2
1-Core 95
2-Core 161
62% 108 Pts
4-Core 226
8-Core 310
34% 268 Pts
64-Core 304
19% 304 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
HP(103C 837D) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 27.20.100.8854
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
5.33% Terrible
Lighting 5.7
Reflection 9.1
Parallax 6.9
5% 7.23 fps
MRender 8.2
Gravity 6.3
Splatting 9.4
7% 7.97 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 5.33%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 500GB-$53
271GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR020
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 406
Write 374
Mixed 354
84% 378 MB/s
4K Read 24.2
4K Write 53.9
4K Mixed 33
108% 37 MB/s
DQ Read 340
DQ Write 225
DQ Mixed 254
197% 273 MB/s
Poor: 78% Great: 125%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
1GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 24
Write 8.5
Mixed 14.3
18% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 3.5
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 2.7
173% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
TOSHIBA MQ04ABF100 1TB
931GB free, PID 0711
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 127
Write 119
Mixed 20
102% 88.6 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
38% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 50%
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
12GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Read 50.3
Write 1.7
Mixed 2.5
13% 18.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Mixed 0
1% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata Samsung M471A1K43BB1-CRC 16GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (24th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
49.4% Average
MC Read 19
MC Write 18
MC Mixed 15.1
50% 17.4 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 19.2
SC Mixed 16.5
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 77%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ProBook 450 G5 Builds (Compare 1,858 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

System: HP ProBook 450 G5

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback