Lenovo 81CM

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics2.24% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 81CM  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory8.2 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210517
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateOct 27 '22 at 03:32
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User DNK-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8550U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 0.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
31.4% Below average
Memory 56.5
1-Core 45.6
2-Core 42
34% 48 Pts
4-Core 37.4
8-Core 56.8
6% 47.1 Pts
64-Core 58.1
4% 58.1 Pts
Poor: 26%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel UHD Graphics 620 (Mobile Kaby Lake R)
Legend(17AA 3973) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing way below expectations (0th percentile)
2.24% Terrible
Lighting 2.3
Reflection 10.2
Parallax 3.4
2% 5.3 fps
MRender 3.8
Gravity 2.9
Splatting 4
3% 3.57 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 2.24%
Great: 6%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Teclast 240GB A800 240GB
142GB free (System drive)
Firmware: H190308
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 392
Write 276
Mixed 280
70% 316 MB/s
4K Read 17.8
4K Write 41.5
4K Mixed 25.2
81% 28.2 MB/s
DQ Read 83.2
DQ Write 66
DQ Mixed 71.7
54% 73.6 MB/s
Poor: 29% Great: 89%
SanDisk Ultra 16GB
3GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 143
Write 13.7
Mixed 47
64% 67.9 MB/s
4K Read 5.9
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 1
76% 2.5 MB/s
Poor: 11% Great: 36%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A5244CB0-CRC 8BA1 Ronisys NB 8G 2400 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
27.8% Poor
MC Read 8.9
MC Write 11.1
MC Mixed 9.7
28% 9.9 GB/s
SC Read 4.6
SC Write 9.1
SC Mixed 7
20% 6.9 GB/s
Latency 138
29% 138 ns
Poor: 18%
This bench: 27.8%
Great: 29%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81CM Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81CM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback