Asus M4N78-VM

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (42nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 58 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics15.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive42.1% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (85%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
19 months ago, 19 months ago.
MotherboardAsus M4N78-VM  (all builds)
Memory2.1 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20091112
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 27 '22 at 01:40
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU 85%

 PC Performing as expected (42nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon II X4 630
AM2, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
35.8% Below average
Memory 49.8
1-Core 39.1
2-Core 79.7
34% 56.2 Pts
4-Core 127
8-Core 134
17% 130 Pts
64-Core 138
8% 138 Pts
Poor: 34%
This bench: 35.8%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 750-$120
MSI(1462 8A9C) 1GB
CLim: 1333 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 522.25
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
15.1% Very poor
Lighting 18.3
Reflection 17.2
Parallax 16.9
15% 17.5 fps
MRender 23.1
Gravity 19
Splatting 15.6
15% 19.2 fps
Poor: 13%
This bench: 15.1%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apacer AS340 120GB
82GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SN05999
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 71 36 23 41 MB/s
Performing below potential (6th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
42.1% Average
Read 186
Write 157
Mixed 177
SusWrite 51.6
32% 143 MB/s
4K Read 27.2
4K Write 41.3
4K Mixed 25.8
96% 31.4 MB/s
DQ Read 28
DQ Write 58.5
DQ Mixed 31.7
27% 39.4 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 42.1%
Great: 91%
Hitachi Deskstar P7K500 500GB-$159
466GB free
Firmware: GM4OA52A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 70 71 37 24 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
39.1% Below average
Read 84
Write 82.1
Mixed 42.4
SusWrite 51.8
48% 65.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.9
162% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 39.1%
Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR2
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
25.2% Poor
MC Read 10.1
MC Write 7
MC Mixed 10.2
26% 9.1 GB/s
SC Read 5.6
SC Write 5.7
SC Mixed 6.5
17% 5.93 GB/s
Latency 162
25% 162 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 25.2%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical M4N78-VM Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 40%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4N78-VM

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback