Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 46%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.3% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20151005
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateOct 26 '22 at 18:03
Run Duration123 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8300-$168
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.25 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (26th percentile)
55.3% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 51.6
2-Core 93.7
48% 74.1 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 271
28% 228 Pts
64-Core 290
18% 290 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 55.3%
Great: 64%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia NVS 315
Nvidia(10DE 102F) 1GB
CLim: 523 MHz, MLim: 437 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 392.68
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
1.3% Terrible
Lighting 1.5
Reflection 2.5
Parallax 0.9
1% 1.63 fps
MRender 2.3
Gravity 1.6
Splatting 1.5
1% 1.8 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.3%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25
29GB free (System drive)
Firmware: MS1O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 105 123 126 155 143 147 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
88.3% Excellent
Read 175
Write 163
Mixed 40.3
SusWrite 133
92% 128 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 88.3%
Great: 103%
USB SG Flash 64GB
55GB free, PID ef18
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 11 11 11 11 12 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (8th percentile)
14.1% Very poor
Read 57.5
Write 11.4
Mixed 18.5
SusWrite 11.4
26% 24.7 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
51% 4.57 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 14.1%
Great: 57%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 99P5474-013.AOOLF 99P5474-013.AOOLF 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
36.8% Below average
MC Read 14.3
MC Write 12.8
MC Mixed 11.8
37% 13 GB/s
SC Read 8.4
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 9.2
25% 8.6 GB/s
Latency 86.5
46% 86.5 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 36.8%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N68-GS4 FX R2.0 Builds (Compare 223 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 18%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 14%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4 FX R2.0

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 81% - Excellent Total price: $177
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback