Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 36% Jet ski	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	4.98% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	47.5% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (48%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6300U 59,619 User benchmarks, average bench 40% U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (22^nd percentile)	30.9% Below average	Memory 28.7 1-Core 73.8 2-Core 126 41% 76.2 Pts	4-Core 190 8-Core 195 26% 193 Pts	64-Core 198 12% 198 Pts
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 30.9% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD 520 (Mobile Skylake) 362,113 User benchmarks, average bench 4% Legend(17AA 5053) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 23.20.16.4973 Performing way above expectations (86^th percentile)	4.98% Terrible	Lighting 5.6 Reflection 3.7 Parallax 5.8 5% 5.03 fps	MRender 6 Gravity 5.6 Splatting 8.8 6% 6.8 fps
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.98% Great: 5%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Liteonit LCS-256L9S-11 2.5 7mm 256GB 4,915 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 209GB free (System drive) Firmware: HC8110E SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 269 322 330 322 275 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	47.5% Average	Read 300 Write 287 Mixed 237 SusWrite 300 63% 281 MB/s	4K Read 7.6 4K Write 12.7 4K Mixed 9.3 30% 9.87 MB/s	DQ Read 184 DQ Write 167 DQ Mixed 165 126% 172 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 47.5% Great: 103%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 Ramaxel RMT3170MN68F9F1600 8GB 51 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 1600, 1600 MHz 4096, 4096 MB Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	27% Poor	MC Read 9.9 MC Write 10.4 MC Mixed 9.5 28% 9.93 GB/s	SC Read 6.2 SC Write 8.4 SC Mixed 7.1 21% 7.23 GB/s	Latency 262 15% 262 ns
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 55%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 44%

Speed boat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

CPU
Core i5-6300UIntelBench 40%, 59,619 samples	6x

GPU
HD 520 (Mobile Skylake)IntelBench 4%, 362,113 samples	6x

SSD
MZ7LN256HMJP-000L7 256GBSamsungBench 94%, 470 samples	5x
LCS-256L9S-11 2.5 7mm 256GBLiteonitBench 83%, 4,915 samples	1x

RAM
RMT3160MP68FAF1600 2x8GBRamaxelBench 54%, 84 samples	4x
M471B1G73EB0-YK0 2x8GBSamsungBench 52%, 10,651 samples	1x
M471B5173QH0-YK0 Ramaxel RMT3170MN68F9F1600 8GBSamsungBench 48%, 51 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16