Apple MacBookAir7,2

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics8.35% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive135% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemApple MacBookAir7,2  (all builds)
MotherboardApple Mac-937CB26E2E02BB01
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1440 x 900 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170618
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateNov 01 '17 at 09:19
Run Duration89 Seconds
Run User MYS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-5350U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz, turbo 2.7 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Memory 76.9
1-Core 93.5
2-Core 157
65% 109 Pts
4-Core 230
8-Core 230
31% 230 Pts
64-Core 229
14% 229 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 6000 (Mobile)
Apple(106B 011B) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4531
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
8.35% Terrible
Lighting 10.5
Reflection 9.96
Parallax 10.1
9% 10.2 fps
MRender 7.71
Gravity 7.9
Splatting 12.3
8% 9.32 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 8.35%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Apple SM0256G PCIe 251GB
156GB free (System drive)
Firmware: BXZ33A0Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
135% Outstanding
Read 1,403
Write 996
Mixed 1,209
267% 1,203 MB/s
4K Read 19.4
4K Write 28
4K Mixed 10.9
58% 19.4 MB/s
DQ Read 16.1
DQ Write 27.2
DQ Mixed 9.77
11% 17.7 MB/s
Poor: 92%
This bench: 135%
Great: 203%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 0x483943434E4E4E424C54424C41522D4E5444 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
55.8% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 22.8
MC Mixed 18
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 15.9
SC Mixed 17.5
46% 16.1 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns
Poor: 40%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 57%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical MacBookAir7,2 Builds (Compare 271 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Apple MacBookAir7,2

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback