Lenovo 10MR004XUK

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 37%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (16th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 84 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics4.72% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive101% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 11 is the most recent version of Windows.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemLenovo 10MR004XUK  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 3111
Memory8.4 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 11
BIOS Date20220727
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateOct 26 '22 at 14:31
Run Duration138 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7400T
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
30.1% Below average
Memory 16.2
1-Core 83.7
2-Core 166
43% 88.5 Pts
4-Core 254
8-Core 245
34% 249 Pts
64-Core 254
16% 254 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 30.1%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)
Legend(17AA 3111) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 31.0.101.2111
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
4.72% Terrible
Lighting 5.2
Reflection 4
Parallax 5.8
4% 5 fps
MRender 6
Gravity 5.1
Splatting 8.8
6% 6.63 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.72%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM961 NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB
206GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXB73H1Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 446 318 283 307 315 320 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 661
Write 468
Mixed 515
SusWrite 332
110% 494 MB/s
4K Read 28
4K Write 54.7
4K Mixed 37.9
120% 40.2 MB/s
DQ Read 440
DQ Write 294
DQ Mixed 345
264% 360 MB/s
Poor: 106%
This bench: 101%
Great: 236%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25
102GB free
Firmware: CS900P13
SusWrite @10s intervals: 292 178 56 59 59 73 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 338
Write 134
Mixed 278
SusWrite 120
48% 217 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 42.2
4K Mixed 18.3
78% 27.2 MB/s
DQ Read 241
DQ Write 230
DQ Mixed 172
146% 214 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 87%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMA851S6AFR6N-UH HMA81GS6AFR8N-UH 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
21.1% Poor
MC Read 6.3
MC Write 10
MC Mixed 7.2
22% 7.83 GB/s
SC Read 3.4
SC Write 8.5
SC Mixed 4.6
16% 5.5 GB/s
Latency 350
11% 350 ns
Poor: 23%
This bench: 21.1%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 10MR004XUK Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 9%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 8%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 10MR004XUK

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 21% - Poor Total price: $28
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year so they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $156Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $361Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback