TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

MSI MS-1812

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 47%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics64.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive103% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (26%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemMicro-Star GT80 2QE
MotherboardMSI MS-1812  (all builds)
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160421
Uptime0 Days
Run DateOct 26 '22 at 07:00
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User IRL-User
Background CPU 26%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-5700HQ
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
67.4% Good
Memory 70.1
1-Core 105
2-Core 200
70% 125 Pts
4-Core 352
8-Core 481
53% 417 Pts
64-Core 509
32% 509 Pts
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 67.4%
 Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980M
MSI(1462 1132) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1126 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 388.00
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.9% Good
Lighting 95
Reflection 55.9
Parallax 49.4
77% 66.8 fps
MRender 53.9
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 45.6
41% 50.3 fps
Poor: 29% ↑
This bench: 64.9%
 Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 256GB
127GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.0.
SusWrite @10s intervals: 251 419 460 458 511 494 MB/s
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Read 982
Write 322
Mixed 422
SusWrite 432
119% 540 MB/s
4K Read 21.7
4K Write 44.7
4K Mixed 14.6
75% 27 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 293
DQ Mixed 271
220% 313 MB/s
Poor: 57% ↑
This bench: 103%
 Great: 237%
Crucial M550 SATA M.2 128GB-$178
119GB free
Firmware: MU01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 328 334 345 351 352 351 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
84.2% Excellent
Read 415
Write 333
Mixed 290
SusWrite 344
78% 345 MB/s
4K Read 23.3
4K Write 58.7
4K Mixed 31
106% 37.7 MB/s
DQ Read 303
DQ Write 315
DQ Mixed 212
186% 277 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑
This bench: 84.2%
 Great: 102%
HGST Travelstar 7K1000 2.5" 1TB
909GB free
Firmware: JB0OA3J0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 125 127 125 125 126 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.8% Very good
Read 129
Write 115
Mixed 37.9
SusWrite 125
74% 102 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
142% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑
This bench: 72.8%
 Great: 75%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX1600C9S3L/8G Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB KHX1600C9S3L/8G Hynix HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 32GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (26th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
53.4% Above average
MC Read 19.7
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 16
54% 18.9 GB/s
SC Read 13.4
SC Write 18.3
SC Mixed 18.2
48% 16.6 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 53.4%
 Great: 69%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical MS-1812 Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 28%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard

Motherboard: MSI MS-1812

CPU
Core i7-4720HQIntelBench 58%, 80,960 samples38x
Core i7-5700HQIntelBench 69%, 14,004 samples24x
Core i7-4980HQIntelBench 69%, 2,147 samples19x
GPU
GTX 980MNvidiaBench 41%, 14,160 samples70x
GTX 970MNvidiaBench 31%, 21,995 samples11x
GTX 965MNvidiaBench 24%, 3,914 samples6x
SSD
Raid 0 Volume 256GBIntelBench 120%, 13,747 samples33x
Raid 0 Volume 512GBIntelBench 191%, 18,578 samples9x
HG6 SATA M.2 128GBToshibaBench 76%, 5,880 samples7x
RAM
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 2x8GBHynixBench 52%, 34,976 samples26x
HMT41GS6BFR8A-PB 4x8GBHynixBench 54%, 1,944 samples16x
MSI16D3LS1MNG/8G 2x8GBKingstonBench 54%, 4,507 samples11x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a large proportion lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales (4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc.). UserBenchmark's data helps consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. In addition, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback